Cause of death and making end‐of‐life decisions in preterm infants has not changed over time: A mortality follow‐back survey

Author:

Goossens Linde1ORCID,Dombrecht Laure23ORCID,Chambaere Kenneth23,Beernaert Kim23ORCID,Cools Filip4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Ghent University Hospital Gent Belgium

2. End‐of‐Life Care Research Group Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Brussel Belgium

3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Gent Belgium

4. Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussel Belgium

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study aimed to evaluate changes over time in cause of death and making end‐of‐life decisions in preterm infants.MethodsA follow‐back survey was conducted of all preterm infants who died between September 2016 and December 2017 in Flanders and Brussels, Belgium. Cause of death was obtained from the death certificate and information on end‐of‐life decisions (ELDs) through an anonymous questionnaire of the certifying physician. Results were compared with a previous study performed between August 1999 and July 2000.ResultsIn the cohort 1999–2000 and 2016–2017, respectively, 150 and 135 deaths were included. A significantly higher proportion of infants born before 26 weeks of gestation was found in the 2016–2017 cohort (53% vs. 24% in 1999–2000, p < 0.001). Extreme immaturity (<26 weeks) remained the most prevalent cause with a significant increase in the 2016–2017 cohort (48% vs. 28% in 1999–2000, p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of ELDs was similar across study periods (61%). Non‐treatment decisions remained the most common ELD (36% and 37%).ConclusionInfants born at the limits of viability have become more prevalent among infant deaths, possibly due to a change in attitude towards periviable births. Neither the process of making ELDs nor the cause of death has changed over time.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3