Restricting diet for perceived health benefit: A mixed‐methods exploration of peripartum food taboos in rural Cambodia

Author:

Labonté Jocelyne M.1,Kroeun Hou2,Sambo Sreang2,Rem Ngik2,Luhovyy Bohdan L.1,Karakochuk Crystal D.3,Green Tim J.45,Wieringa Frank T.67,Sophonneary Prak8,Measelle Jeffrey R.9,Baldwin Dare9,Whitfield Kyly C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Applied Human Nutrition Mount Saint Vincent University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada

2. Helen Keller International Cambodia Phnom Penh Cambodia

3. Food, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems The University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

4. SAHMRI Women and Kids South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute Adelaide South Australia Australia

5. Discipline of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

6. French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD) Montpellier France

7. UMR Qualisud, CIRAD, Institut Agro, IRD, Université Montpellier, Université Avignon Université de la Réunion Montpellier France

8. National Nutrition Programme, Maternal and Child Health Centre Cambodia Ministry of Health Phnom Penh Cambodia

9. Department of Psychology University of Oregon Eugene Oregon USA

Abstract

AbstractFood taboos encompass food restrictions practiced by a group that go beyond individual preferences. During pregnancy and lactation, food taboos may contribute to inadequate nutrition and poor maternal and infant health. Restriction of specific fish, meat, fruits and vegetables is common among peripartum women in many Southeast Asian countries, but data from Cambodia are lacking. In this mixed‐methods study, 335 Cambodian mothers were asked open‐ended questions regarding dietary behaviours during pregnancy and up to 24 weeks postpartum. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to characterize food taboos and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of this practice. Participants were 18–44 years of age, all of Khmer ethnicity and 31% were primiparous. Sixty‐six per cent of women followed food taboos during the first 2 weeks postpartum, whereas ~20% of women restricted foods during other peripartum periods. Pregnancy taboos were often beneficial, including avoidance of sugar‐sweetened beverages, coffee and alcohol. Conversely, postpartum avoidances typically included nutrient‐dense foods such as fish, raw vegetables and chicken. Food taboos were generally followed to support maternal and child health. No significant predictors of food taboos during pregnancy were identified. Postpartum, each additional live birth a woman had reduced her odds of following food taboos by 24% (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.76 [0.61–0.95]). Specific food taboo practices and rationales varied greatly between women, suggesting that food taboos are shaped less by a strict belief system within the Khmer culture and more by individual or household understandings of food and health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

New York Academy of Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3