Safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction exercise in individuals with neurological disorders: A systematic review

Author:

Jønsson Anette Bach12ORCID,Krogh Søren12,Laursen Henrik Sehested3ORCID,Aagaard Per4,Kasch Helge25,Nielsen Jørgen Feldbæk126

Affiliation:

1. Spinal Cord Injury Center of Western Denmark Viborg Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Health Aarhus University Aarhus N Denmark

3. Medical Library Regional Hospital Central Jutland Viborg Denmark

4. Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Muscle Physiology and Biomechanics Research Unit University of Southern Odense Denmark

5. Department of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

6. Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Clinic Hammel Denmark

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThis systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) on skeletal muscle size, strength, and functional performance in individuals with neurological disorders (ND).MethodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. Two researchers independently assessed eligibility and performed data extraction and quality assessments. Eligibility criteria: Study populations with ND, BFRE as intervention modality, outcome measures related to safety or efficacy.ResultsOut of 443 studies identified, 16 were deemed eligible for review. Three studies examined the efficacy and safety of BFRE, one study focused on efficacy results, and 12 studies investigated safety. Disease populations included spinal cord injury (SCI), inclusion body myositis (sIBM), multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke. A moderate‐to‐high risk of bias was presented in the quality assessment. Five studies reported safety concerns, including acutely elevated pain and rating of perceived exertion levels, severe fatigue, muscle soreness, and cases of autonomic dysreflexia. Two RCTs reported a significant between‐group difference in physical function outcomes, and two RCTs reported neuromuscular adaptations.ConclusionBFRE seems to be a potentially safe and effective training modality in individuals with ND. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to limited quality and number of studies, small sample sizes, and a general lack of heterogeneity within and between the examined patient cohorts.

Funder

Aarhus Universitet

Jascha Fonden

Helsefonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference76 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3