Adjunctive cenobamate in highly active and ultra‐refractory focal epilepsy: A “real‐world” retrospective study

Author:

Peña‐Ceballos Javier1,Moloney Patrick B.123ORCID,Munteanu Tudor1,Doyle Michael123,Colleran Niamh1,Liggan Brenda1,Breen Annette1,Murphy Sinead1,El‐Naggar Hany1ORCID,Widdess‐Walsh Peter1ORCID,Delanty Norman123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Beaumont Hospital Dublin Ireland

2. School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin Ireland

3. FutureNeuro, the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases Dublin Ireland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveRecent clinical trials have shown that cenobamate substantially improves seizure control in focal‐onset drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, little is known about cenobamate's performance in highly active (20 seizures/month) and ultra‐refractory focal epilepsy (6 failed epilepsy treatments, including antiseizure medications [ASMs], epilepsy surgery, and vagus nerve stimulation). Here, we studied cenobamate's efficacy and tolerability in a “real‐world” severe DRE cohort.MethodsWe conducted a single‐center retrospective analysis of consecutive adults treated with cenobamate between October 2020 and September 2022. All patients received cenobamate through an Early Access Program. Cenobamate retention, seizure outcomes, treatment‐emergent adverse events, and adjustments to concomitant ASMs were analyzed.ResultsFifty‐seven patients received cenobamate for at least 3 months (median duration, 11 months). The median cenobamate dose was 250 mg/day (range 75–350 mg). Baseline demographics were consistent with highly active (median seizure frequency, 60/month) and ultra‐refractory epilepsy (median previously failed ASMs, nine). Most (87.8%) had prior epilepsy surgery and/or vagus nerve stimulation. Six patients stopped cenobamate due to lack of efficacy and/or adverse events. One patient died from factors unrelated to cenobamate. Among patients who continued cenobamate, three achieved seizure freedom (5.3% of cohort), 24 had a 75%–99% reduction in seizures (42.1% of cohort), and 16 had a 50%–74% reduction (28.1% of cohort). Cenobamate led to abolition of focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures in 55.6% (20/36) of patients. Among treatment responders, 67.4% (29/43) were treated with cenobamate doses of 250 mg/day. Three‐fourths of patients reported at least one side‐effect, most commonly fatigue and somnolence. Adverse events most commonly emerged at cenobamate doses of 250 mg/day. Side‐effects were partially manageable by reducing the overall ASM burden, most often clobazam, eslicarbazepine, and perampanel.SignificancePatients with highly active and ultra‐refractory focal epilepsy experienced meaningful seizure outcomes on cenobamate. Emergence of adverse events at doses above 250 mg/day may limit the potential for further improvements in seizure control at higher cenobamate doses.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3