Affiliation:
1. Katharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre London UK
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust London UK
3. Institute for Women's Health University College London London UK
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionWomen with VWD have an increased risk of gynaecological complications due to haemostatic challenges of menstruation.AimReview gynecological bleeding symptoms and their management in women with moderate‐severe VWD.Materials and MethodsRetrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data for women with moderate and severe VWD attending a joint multidisciplinary clinic between January 2010 and December 2020. Data was collected from electronic patient records on response to treatment options using PBAC, quality of life (QoL) assessment using SF‐36 scores, haemoglobin and ferritin in comparison to pre‐treatment values.ResultsOf the 67 women managed in the clinic; all reported heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Combination therapy with concurrent hormonal agents and tranexamic acid was required in 80% of women. There was an overall 64% improvement in PBAC scores in the first year, reflecting on QoL with 35% improvement in SF‐36 score and correction of anaemia in 21% of cases. The cumulative effect of continued treatment culminated in greater reduction of blood loss, with an overall 71% improvement in PBAC scores by 5 years. One in 10 women required surgical treatment for a gynaecological pathology. Non‐compliance was the cause of excessive unscheduled bleeding in 50% of adolescents. After 3 years, one in five women experienced a relapse of symptom, of whom 46% became perimenopausal and 54% discontinued hormonal treatments due to concerns about fertility, hair loss and weight gain.ConclusionManagement of HMB requires careful monitoring and follow‐up by MDT with close collaboration between the gynaecology team and HTC. Control of HMB often requires a combination therapy.