Does training people to administer take-home naloxone increase their knowledge? Evidence from Australian programs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Does training people to administer take-home naloxone increase their knowledge? Evidence from Australian programs

Published:2018-02-22 Issue:4 Volume:37 Page:472-479
ISSN:0959-5236
Container-title:Drug and Alcohol Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Drug Alcohol Rev.

Author:

Dietze Paul M.¹²^ORCID,Draper Bridget¹,Olsen Anna³^ORCID,Chronister Karen J.⁴⁵^ORCID,van Beek Ingrid⁴⁵,Lintzeris Nicholas⁴⁶,Dwyer Robyn⁷⁸⁹,Nelson Marina¹⁰,Lenton Simon¹⁰

Affiliation:

1. Behaviours and Health Risks Program; Burnet Institute; Melbourne Australia

2. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia

3. Research School of Population Health; Australian National University; Canberra Australia

4. South Eastern Sydney Local Health District; Sydney Australia

5. Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney; Sydney Australia

6. Division Addiction Medicine; University of Sydney; Sydney Australia

7. Social Studies of Addiction Concepts; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University; Melbourne Australia

8. Centre for Cultural Diversity and Wellbeing; Victoria University; Melbourne Australia

9. Centre for Alcohol Policy Research; Curtin University; Melbourne Australia

10. National Drug Research Institute; Curtin University; Perth Australia

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

WA Mental Health Commission

Mundipharma

Braeburn

Indivior

Gilead Sciences Inc.

National Drug Research Institute

Australian Government under the Drug and Alcohol Grants Fund

Mental Health Commission

ACT Health

Victoria University Out-of-Cycle Collaborative Grants Scheme

Centre for Research Excellence in Injecting Drug Use

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health(social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/dar.12680/fullpdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Assessing causality in drug policy analyses: how useful are the Bradford Hill criteria in analysing take-home naloxone programs?;Olsen;Drug Alcohol Rev,2018

2. Are take-home naloxone programmes effective? Systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria;McDonald;Addiction,2016

3. Findings and lessons learnt from implementing Australia's first health service based take-home naloxone program;Chronister;Drug Alcohol Rev,2018

4. Development of opioid overdose knowledge (OOKS) and attitudes (OOAS) scales for take-home naloxone training evaluation;Williams;Drug Alcohol Depend,2013

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceived stigma toward naloxone among overdose education and naloxone distribution program participants: Implications for opioid overdose response.;Stigma and Health;2024-03-07

2. Descriptive before-and-after study of the introduction of a ‘Leave Behind’ take-home naloxone dispensing/distribution program by the ambulance service in Western Australia;Paramedicine;2024-01-15

3. The National Naloxone Reference Group: A collective voice on take‐home naloxone policy and practice in Australia;Drug and Alcohol Review;2023-11-03

4. “It can save your life, that’s all I know,” barriers and facilitators for engagement in take-home naloxone for people receiving opioid substitution treatment in regional Australia: An explorative study;Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare;2023-07-19

5. Naloxone Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Overdose Response Among Family Members of People who Misuse Opioids;Journal of Community Health;2023-07-14