The effectiveness and feasibility of using multi‐lead ECG monitoring combined with a programmed intracavitary ECG to complete left bundle branch area pacing

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing, is difficult for many primary hospitals that lack the electrophysiological multichannel recorder to carry out. We hope to find a simple and feasible method that combines the multi‐lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and the intracavity ECG of the pacing programmer to achieve LBBaP.MethodsA total of 50 patients with bradycardia indications who attempted permanent pacemaker implantation were included in this study. We referred to multi‐lead surface ECG monitoring and pacing system analyzer (PSA), combined with the nine‐zone pacing method of the LBBaP, to complete LBBaP. We assessed multiple parameters to verify whether the LBBaP was successfully achieved and used univariable analysis of variance for repeated measures to judge the feasibility and effectiveness of LBBaP without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder.ResultsLBBaP was successfully archived without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder in 44 of 50 patients (88%). In the study, paced QRS duration and the stimulus to peak left ventricular activation time (Sti‐LVAT) were 117.04 ± 10.34 ms and 71.10 ± 7.91 ms and had no significant changes in the 3‐month follow‐up. The unipolar pacing threshold and R‐wave amplitudes were 0.85 ± 0.32 V and 10.36 ± 5.24 mV at baseline respectively, which also showed stability during the 1‐month and 3‐month follow‐up. During the 3‐month follow‐up, no lead‐related complication was recorded.ConclusionIt is effective and feasible to achieve LBBaP combining the multi‐lead ECG monitoring and the intracavitary ECG of PSA without the electrophysiological multichannel recorder, which could be an alternative to perform LBBaP.