Actualization of evidence‐based nursing in primary, specialized, and social care settings—A cross‐sectional survey

Author:

Hamari Lotta1234ORCID,Holopainen Arja123ORCID,Nyman Johanna4,Pukkila Heidi5,Siltanen Hannele123,Parisod Heidi1234

Affiliation:

1. Nursing Research Foundation Helsinki Finland

2. The Finnish Centre for Evidence‐Based Health Care – A JBI Centre of Excellence Helsinki Finland

3. WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Helsinki Finland

4. Department of Nursing Science University of Turku Turku Finland

5. Free Agent Statistician Finland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBasing practice on evidence is a widely acknowledged requirement for nursing, but shortcomings still exist. An increased understanding of the actualization of evidence‐based nursing (EBN) across different nursing contexts is needed to develop better support for EBN and promote uniform high‐quality nursing.AimsThe aim of this study was to compare the actualization of EBN in different organizational contexts in Finland.MethodsData for this survey were collected in 2021. The actualization of EBN in primary, specialized, and social care organizations was evaluated with the Actualization of Evidence‐Based Nursing instrument, nurses' version, which focuses on individual and organizational‐level EBN support structures. Differences between (1) specialized and primary healthcare, and (2) different nursing practice settings were tested with Welch's two sample t‐test, the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsBased on nurse (n = 1020) evaluations, those working in specialized healthcare hold more positive attitudes toward EBN (p = .021) and evaluated their organization's methods for monitoring and evaluating nursing practices (p = .004) more positively than those working in primary healthcare. Regarding different nursing practice settings (n = 1241), the most positive results were observed within preventive healthcare where nurses evaluated their attitudes toward EBN, EBN competence, and personal evidence‐based practices more positively compared to other nursing practice settings. The results were parallel regarding several organizational structures for EBN. Positive results were also observed within somatic units at university hospitals, and most negative results were within institutional care settings, health centers, and home care settings.Linking Evidence to ActionThere is a need for targeted support to strengthen EBN across different organizational contexts, with special attention to those contexts where nursing professionals with lower education levels work. Future research needs to focus on further analyzing the organizational differences and what can be learned, especially from preventive healthcare but also somatic units at university hospitals.

Funder

Sairaanhoitajien koulutussäätiö

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3