Flemish equine veterinarians' perceptions on the use of and client communication about complementary and alternative veterinary medicine

Author:

Keller Pia1ORCID,Hudders Liselot2,Decloedt Annelies1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Ghent University Merelbeke Belgium

2. Centre for Persuasive Communication, Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundComplementary and alternative veterinary medicine (CAVM) is increasingly popular in horses. As CAVM usage could have risks, client–veterinarian communication about CAVM is crucial.ObjectivesEvaluating equine veterinarians' attitude towards CAVM, their CAVM usage and veterinarian–client communication about CAVM.Study designCross‐sectional study.MethodA telephone survey was conducted among equine veterinarians providing ambulatory care on a daily or weekly basis. The first section of the survey included questions about the veterinarians' attitude towards CAVM and their CAVM usage. The second section focused on veterinary–client communication about CAVM.ResultsWhen herbs are included as CAVM modality, 83% of the participants applied CAVM. Nighty‐eight percent had already communicated with horse owners about CAVM and 81% agreed to be open to talk about CAVM. However, 95% agreed that sometimes CAVM usage takes place without disclosure to the veterinarian. The majority of participants communicated about CAVM on a weekly (40%) or daily (22%) basis, most often in person during consultations (99%) or via phone (32%). The median percentage of conversations about CAVM initiated by the owner was 50% (range 50%–80%). When the veterinarian initiated the conversation, this was usually by mentioning it as a treatment option, mostly in addition to conventional treatments. Some participants directly asked about CAVM use in the information‐gathering phase.Main limitationsA convenience sample was used due to lack of data on the number of equine veterinarians in Flanders. Potential favourability bias with higher participation of veterinarians interested in CAVM.ConclusionEquine veterinarians generally had a positive attitude towards CAVM use, although this depended on the specific modality. Veterinarian–client communication about CAVM occurs frequently in ambulatory care. An open dialogue with horse owners about CAVM is important to provide information about CAVM and thus enable them to make informed decisions concerning CAVM usage, together with their veterinarian.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. A cross‐sectional study investigating the prevalence of and motivations for using alternative medicines by equine owners on their animals;Brennan MC;Equine Vet J,2018

2. Attitude and behavior of veterinarians surrounding the use of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine in the treatment of equine musculoskeletal pain;Bergenstrahle A;J Equine Vet Sci,2016

3. A questionnaire study on the use of complementary and alternative veterinary medicine for horses in Sweden;Gilberg K;Animals,2021

4. The use of alternative therapies in racing thoroughbreds;Coleman HJ;Proc N Z Soc Anim Prod,2006

5. A survey examining attitudes towards equine complementary therapies for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries;Thirkell J;J Equine Vet Sci,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3