Comparison of oral esomeprazole and oral omeprazole in the treatment of equine squamous gastric disease

Author:

Sundra Tania1ORCID,Gough Sarah2ORCID,Rossi Gabriele3,Kelty Erin4,Rendle David5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Avon Ridge Equine Veterinary Services Brigadoon Western Australia Australia

2. Hunter Equine Centre Scone New South Wales Australia

3. School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia

4. School of Population and Global Health The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia

5. EMT Consulting Devon UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOral omeprazole is the accepted treatment for equine squamous gastric disease (ESGD); however, it is not universally effective. Esomeprazole results in more consistent and pronounced acid suppression in men and is more effective than omeprazole in the treatment of oesophageal and gastric disease. Pharmacodynamic and pilot clinical studies have indicated esomeprazole might also be more effective than omeprazole in horses.ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of oral esomeprazole and omeprazole pastes in the treatment of ESGD and, where present, concurrent equine glandular gastric disease (EGGD).Study designRandomised, single‐blinded controlled trial.MethodsHorses presenting with grade ≥2 ESGD lesions were randomly allocated to receive 4 mg/kg of either a buffered esomeprazole or omeprazole paste orally once daily for 28 days before gastroscopy being repeated within a further 3 days. Videos and images were anonymised and subsequently graded blind by one researcher. The severity of ESGD (and EGGD) lesions before and after treatment, and thereby treatment responses, were compared using univariable logistic regression.ResultsA higher proportion of horses had ESGD healing in response to esomeprazole treatment (63/74, 85%) than with omeprazole treatment (43/73, 59%) (odds ratio [OR]: 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81, 8.82,p = 0.001). In a subset of horses that had concurrent EGGD, a greater proportion of the horses treated with esomeprazole had lesions ≤grade 1 (esomeprazole 28/51, 55%; omeprazole 6/24, 25%; OR: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.25, 10.71,p = 0.02) Using grade 0 as the benchmark for EGGD healing, the difference remained significant (OR: 4.44, 95% CI: 1.33, 14.85,p = 0.02).Main limitationsIt may not be possible to extrapolate these results to other populations with different signalment or management.ConclusionsOral‐buffered esomeprazole was a more effective treatment for ESGD (and concurrent EGGD) than oral‐buffered omeprazole.

Funder

Luoda Pharma

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Highlights of recent clinically relevant papers;Equine Veterinary Education;2024-01-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3