Efficacy and safety of cetagliptin as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3 trial

Abstract

AbstractAimTo assess the efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor, cetagliptin, as monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycaemic control.Materials and MethodsIn total, 504 eligible patients with T2D were enrolled and randomized to cetagliptin 50 mg once daily, cetagliptin 100 mg once daily or placebo at a ratio of 2:2:1 for 24 weeks of double‐blind treatment, then all patients received cetagliptin 100 mg once daily for 28 weeks of open‐label treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in HbA1c level from baseline at week 24.ResultsAfter 24 weeks, HbA1c from baseline was significantly reduced with cetagliptin 50 mg (−1.08%) and cetagliptin 100 mg (−1.07%) compared with placebo (−0.35%). The placebo‐subtracted HbA1c reduction was −0.72% with cetagliptin 50 mg and 100 mg. Patients with a baseline HbA1c of 8.5% or higher had a greater HbA1c reduction with cetagliptin than those patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 8.5%. Both doses studied led to a significantly higher proportion of patients (42.3% with 100 mg and 45.0% with 50 mg) achieving an HbA1c of less than 7.0% compared with placebo (12.9%). Cetagliptin also significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose and 2‐hour postmeal plasma glucose relative to placebo. The incidence of adverse experiences was similar between cetagliptin and placebo. No drug‐related hypoglycaemia was reported.ConclusionsCetagliptin monotherapy was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with T2D who had inadequate glycaemic control on exercise and diet.