Affiliation:
1. School of Public Affairs University of Colorado Denver Denver Colorado USA
2. John Glenn College of Public Affairs The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
Abstract
AbstractPolicy conflicts are ubiquitous in many countries. Yet research on policy conflict is typically based on cases in western, democratic countries. As a result, little is known about the characteristics of policy conflicts in non‐western countries, such as China, or how these characteristics compare to western contexts. The Policy Conflict Framework (PCF) was recently developed to help scholars identify, diagnose, and compare policy conflict characteristics. This research uses the PCF to guide a comparative analysis of the nature of policy conflicts in China and the United States. With interview data on policy actors from Chongqing, China and Colorado, USA, we present the findings by comparing the differences and similarities of policy conflicts in the two countries around shale oil and gas development. We conclude with the strengths and limitations of this comparative study of policy conflicts in China and other national contexts, along with recommendations for conducting PCF research in China.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Political Science and International Relations
Reference43 articles.
1. Punctuated Equilibrium and the Information Disadvantage of Authoritarianism: Evidence from the People's Republic of China
2. Chongqing Shale Industrial Development Plan. (2015 March 27).https://www.google.com/search?q=Shale+Gas+Development+Plan+(2011‐2015)&oq=Shale+Gas+Development+Plan+(2011–2015)&aqs=chrome..69i57.401j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF‐8#q=%E9%87%8D%E5%BA%86%E9%A1%B5%E5%B2%A9%E6%B0%94%E4%BA%A7%E4%B8%9A%E8%A7%84%E5%88%92
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献