Gender equality in Swedish AI policies. What's the problem represented to be?

Author:

Rönnblom Malin1ORCID,Carlsson Vanja2,Öjehag‐Pettersson Andreas1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden

2. School of Public Administration Gothenburg University Gothenburg Sweden

Abstract

AbstractOver the past few decades, Sweden has established itself as a “world leader” in gender equality. Alongside this development, Swedish politicians have also initiated ambitious plans that aim to establish the country as “world class” in terms of digitalization. International research shows that women and racialized groups are in a minority in the design processes, that AI facial recognition systems are built with white male faces as the norm, and that digital tools replicate racial injustices. In this paper, we are interested in if, and if so how, gender equality is articulated and thus filled with meaning in national policies on AI and digitalization. The overall aim is to discuss the potential of gender (equality) mainstreaming to challenge systems of privilege in the implementation of AI systems in the public sector. The paper analyses how gender equality is filled with meaning in national policy documents on AI and gender equality. The main findings show that gender equality is turned into a question of lack of knowledge and information, which in turn blocks out an understanding of gender equality as something that is related to gendered power relations.

Funder

Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Political Science and International Relations

Reference50 articles.

1. 2017/18:47 (Skr.) Hur Sverige blir bäst i världen på att använda digitaliseringens möjligheter—en skrivelse om politikens inriktning (Government Paper).

2. Narrative dynamics in European Commission AI policy—Sensemaking, agency construction, and anchoring

3. Discursive framing and organizational venues: mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Politics and policy of Artificial Intelligence;Review of Policy Research;2023-09

2. Power and politics in framing bias in Artificial Intelligence policy;Review of Policy Research;2023-06-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3