Evaluation of Self‐Reported professionalism lapses among dental undergraduate students: A cross‐sectional study from a Malaysian dental faculty

Author:

Veerabhadrappa Suresh Kandagal1,Pandarathodiyil Anitha Krishnan1ORCID,Ghani Wan Maria Nabillah2,Termizi Bin Zamzuri Ahmad1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Dentistry SEGi University Petaling Jaya Malaysia

2. Oral Cancer Research & Coordinating Centre (OCRCC), Faculty of Dentistry University of Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionProfessionalism and academic integrity are important components of dental education as they influence not just the present‐day learning process, but also the practice of dentistry in future. This study evaluated self‐reported professional lapses, academic dishonesty behaviours among peers and recommended sanctions for such lapses.Materials and MethodsDundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity questionnaire was administered to BDS students of a private dental institution in Malaysia. Differences in the level of recommended sanctions were assessed by Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis test.ResultsThere was unanimous agreement that all 34 statements of lapses of academic integrity as unacceptable. The highest agreement (95.6%) was related to threatening or abusing university employees or students and involvement in paedophilic activities, whereas the lowest agreement was observed for getting or giving help for coursework against rules (47.3%). The most frequent behaviours observed among peers were lack of class punctuality (55.1%) and providing and receiving proxy attendance services (49.3%). About 36% admitted to not being punctual themselves, 26.8% for accepting or providing help for course work and 22.9% for receiving and providing proxy attendance. Female students displayed stricter recommended sanctions, with the most significant difference relating to joking disrespectfully about body parts (p < .001). More lenient recommended sanctions were observed among Year 1 students compared with other years, with the most significant difference (p < .001) observed for exchanging information about the exam, forging a signature, plagiarising and cut‐pasting materials without acknowledgement.ConclusionThe majority of academic lapses were well comprehended. Significant differences were observed in sanctions imposed in terms of gender and year of study.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3