Informing knowledge translation for selective dorsal rhizotomy: A survey of Australian clinicians and people with lived experience of cerebral palsy

Author:

Lewis Jennifer A1ORCID,Paget Simon P12ORCID,Wimalasundera Neil34,Wynter Meredith5,Campbell Lani2,Lee Olivia S34,Stewart Kirsty12ORCID,Shah R6,McKay Marnee J2,

Affiliation:

1. Kids Rehab The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. The Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Victorian Paediatric Rehabilitation Service The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Honorary Fellow Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. Queensland Paediatric Rehabilitation Service Queensland Children's Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy Knowledge Translation Research Group Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Westmead NSW Australia

Abstract

AimSelective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical intervention used to reduce spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). There is minimal relevant, evidence‐based information available for Australian families and clinicians. This study aims to investigate the knowledge of people with lived experience and clinicians regarding SDR, including how they currently access information and what information they seek.MethodsAdults with CP, carers of children with CP and clinicians treating children with CP were invited to complete an online survey. Data regarding participant demographics, current knowledge and confidence in knowledge about CP and SDR, information source/s used and participants level of trust in these sources are presented as counts and percentages. Comparisons in knowledge between groups were analysed.ResultsA total of 114 surveys were completed: 63 clinicians, 48 carers, and 3 adults with CP. Eighty percent of clinicians were allied health professionals. People with lived experience were less confident in their knowledge about SDR compared to knowledge of CP (P < 0.001). Clinicians rated scientific research literature and the hospital team as the most useful and trustworthy information source. People with lived experience used a wider range of information sources including the internet, rating their community therapy team and other people with lived experience as the most useful.ConclusionThis study identified a lack of confidence in knowledge of SDR for people with lived experience, likely due to a gap in accessible and readable evidence‐based information. While both groups differed in how they access information, there was agreement that greater information about SDR is needed.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3