All aboard? An analysis of public opinion regarding high‐speed rail

Author:

Johnson Sara1ORCID,Elliott Euel1

Affiliation:

1. School of Economic, Political, and Policy Sciences The University of Texas at Dallas Richardson Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveHigh‐speed rail is not well utilized in the United States. This study examines public interest in high‐speed rail and the role the apparent urban–rural political divide may play in its establishment.MethodsData from a sample of 1648 U.S. residents and 515 Texas residents surveyed in Fall 2020 and Spring 2021 were analyzed to determine their likelihood of choosing high‐speed rail if it was available.ResultsResults found that 35 percent of national respondents and 52 percent of Texas respondents indicated they are likely to choose high‐speed rail. Characteristics such as age, education, gender, and political party affiliation had a statistically significant relationship with a respondent's likelihood of choosing high‐speed rail.ConclusionThis analysis indicates an interest in high‐speed rail in both samples. Many of the characteristics of those likely to choose high‐speed rail are consistent with typical early adopters of innovation. Democrats seem more likely to consider high‐speed rail, however identifying as either a Republican or a Democrat resulted in a positive, statistically significant relationship with an interest in high‐speed rail in the Texas sample. While this discussion does appear to have a partisan divide, other characteristics seem to be a strong predictor of interest in high‐speed rail.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference38 articles.

1. COMETrends. n.d.The University of Texas at Dallas COMETrends.https://cometrends.utdallas.edu/

2. Barrow K.2018. “Texas Central Trailblazing Privately Funded HSR. Railway Age.”https://www.railwayage.com/passenger/high‐performance/texas‐central‐trailblazing‐privately‐funded‐hsr/.

3. Beal G. M. &J. M.Bohlen1956.“The Diffusion Process.” Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies Conference Paper/Presentation.https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/17351?ln=en.

4. Board of Directors. n.d. “Texans Against High Speed Rail.”https://www.texansagainsthsr.com/about‐us/#directors

5. Policy Climates and Reductions in Automobile Use*

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3