Survey of General Practitioner Perspectives on Endometriosis Diagnosis, Referrals, Management and Guidelines in New Zealand

Author:

Ellis Katherine12ORCID,Meador Alina3,Ponnampalam Anna45,Wood Rachael16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

2. Endometriosis New Zealand Christchurch New Zealand

3. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences The University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

4. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

5. Pūtahi Manawa‐Healthy Hearts for Aotearoa New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence Auckland New Zealand

6. Biomolecular Interaction Centre University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionThere is a growing body of literature concerning endometriosis patients' perspectives on the healthcare system and endometriosis care in New Zealand. However, there is little research available on the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) internationally, and none currently in New Zealand. The purpose of this study is to address New Zealand GPs' understanding of and approach to endometriosis diagnosis, referrals, management and guidelines.Methods and MaterialsAn online, anonymous survey was shared with 869 GP clinics and completed by 185 New Zealand‐based GPs regarding their awareness and application of the inaugural 2020 ‘Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis in New Zealand’ guidelines, their perception of their endometriosis knowledge, the diagnostic value they assign to symptoms, the treatments they recommend and the reasons they refer patients to specialist gynaecologists. Differences between groups were conducted using Chi‐squared tests, and text answers were assessed thematically using inductive, semantic coding.ResultsAll 185 GPs had gynaecology consults, and 73% had gynaecology consults every week. Despite 65% being aware of the 2020 guidelines, only 35% overall had read them. Only 52% of GPs considered themselves to know enough about endometriosis for their routine practice. The most common treatment to be considered first line was intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs; 96%), whereas the most common alternative treatment recommended was exercise (69%). The most common reason for referral to specialist care was the failure of all attempted treatments (84%).ConclusionsMany of the study's results align with current New Zealand and international endometriosis guidelines, particularly the prioritisation of progestin‐only therapies, the reduced emphasis on surgical treatment as the first line and the low rates of alternative treatment recommendations. This study also highlights the need to improve awareness of inappropriate GP recommendations, including long‐term treatment with prescription‐only pain relief such as codeine and pregnancy for symptomatic relief.Patient or Public ContributionTwo of the authors involved in the design and conduct of the study, data interpretation and manuscript preparation have sought care for endometriosis.Trial RegistrationNA

Publisher

Wiley

Reference51 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3