Motivational interviewing for preventing oral morbidities in adults: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Cartes‐Velásquez Ricardo1ORCID,Varnet‐Pérez Tomás2ORCID,Martínez‐Delgado Cecilia María3ORCID,Villanueva‐Vilchis María del Carmen4ORCID,Ramírez‐Trujillo María de los Ángeles4ORCID,Faustino‐Silva Daniel Demétrio5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile

2. Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

3. Universidad CES Medellín Colombia

4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Leon Mexico

5. Grupo Hospitalar Conceição Porto Alegre Brazil

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis systematic review with meta‐analysis was performed to assess whether motivational interviewing (MI) effectively prevents oral morbidities in adults.MethodsStudies considered were randomized controlled trials, cluster‐randomized controlled trials and community‐based randomized trials assessing interventions based on MI or indicating that a counselling technique based on the principles developed by Miller and Rollnick was used. Controls were any type of oral health education or negative controls. Participants were 18–60 years old. The main outcome was any oral morbidity. From 602 studies identified in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS databases, seven studies were included in the synthesis.ResultsStudies included only evaluated periodontal outcomes, no studies were found for other oral morbidities. Patients' mean age was 43.7 years, and the follow‐up time after MI or MI‐based intervention varied between 1 month and 1 year. The total study population was 272 people with moderate‐to‐severe periodontitis; other groups analysed were pregnant women (n = 112) and patients with mental disorders and alcohol problems (n = 60). Meta‐analysis for the plaque index (four studies, n = 267), bleeding on probing (two studies, n = 177) and gingival index (two studies, n = 166) were carried out. The summary effects for the random‐effects model were estimated respectively as −3.59 percentage points (CI: [−11.44; 4.25] for plaque index, −6.41 percentage points (CI: [−12.18, −0.65]) for bleeding on probing and −0.70 (CI: [−1.87; 0.48]) for gingival index, marginally favouring the MI group. The reduced number of studies, the non‐disclosure of some aspects of the data and the heterogeneity among them undermine the precision of the estimates.ConclusionThe current evidence available is limited to periodontal outcomes, and it is not possible to determine whether MI effectively prevents oral morbidities in adults.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3