Does subsidized orthodontic treatment reduce inequalities in access? Evidence from Norway based on population register data

Author:

Jiang Nan1,Kinge Jonas Minet23,Skau Irene1,Grytten Jostein14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Dentistry University of Oslo Oslo Norway

2. Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

3. Department of Health Management and Health Economics University of Oslo Oslo Norway

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital Lørenskog Norway

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveAn important part of Norwegian welfare policy is to provide subsidized orthodontic treatment for children and adolescents. The objective of this policy is that dental services should be allocated according to children's need for treatment, and not according to parents' ability to pay. The probability of receiving orthodontic treatment independent of parent's household income was examined.MethodsThe study population encompassed children and adolescents aged 10–18 years in 2019 (n = 354 439). Information about whether they had started orthodontic treatment was obtained from the Norwegian Health Economics Administration. The key independent variable was net equalized household income. Inequalities were measured using concentration indices, which were estimated according to the severity of the malocclusion (very great need, great need, obvious need and no need). Two indices were used to measure relative inequality: the unstandardized concentration index and the partial concentration index. Absolute inequality was measured using the corrected concentration index. Relevant control variables were included in some of the analyses.ResultsThe unstandardized indices were in the range 0.04 (very great need) to 0.05 (obvious need). For all three groups of severity, the 95% confidence intervals overlapped. The values of the partial indices were significantly lower than the values of the unstandardized indices. The partial indices were in the range 0.008 (very great need) to 0.03 (obvious need). The 95% confidence intervals for the partial indices did not overlap with the 95% confidence intervals of the unstandardized indices. For all three groups of severity, the indices that measured absolute inequality were close to zero.ConclusionsIt is possible to achieve the egalitarian aim of equality in service provision by subsidizing orthodontic treatment. This is possible within a system where the cost of orthodontic treatment is reimbursed according to the criteria of need. These criteria function in such a way that patients with the greatest need for orthodontic treatment are given the highest priority.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Dentistry

Reference47 articles.

1. Oral healthcare systems in the extended European Union;Widström E;Oral Health Prev Dent,2004

2. Evaluation of different oral care systems: results for Germany and selected highly developed countries. An update of a former study;Saekel R;Dent Oral Craniofac Res,2018

3. Policies for improving oral health in Europe

4. Comparative study of oral health systems in Europe;Murariu A;Rom J Oral Rehabil,2020

5. Comparing oral health systems for children in six European countries to identify lessons learned for universal oral health coverage: A study protocol.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3