Justice metamorphosis: Moving from reactive to proactive strategies to remotely protect families from intimate partner violence

Author:

Davis Alicia1,Vandenberg Van Zee Sarah1,Geiger Conor1

Affiliation:

1. National Center for State Courts Williamsburg Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractThe pandemic accelerated the adoption of remote access to courts through e‐filing and virtual hearings. Concurrently, courts experienced an increase in intimate partner violence cases due in part to heightened stress during the pandemic. Virtual technology became crucial for individuals seeking relief from harm when traditional support systems were limited. However, remote proceedings lack the personal connection found in‐person, making it challenging to handle complex cases involving parenting and intimate partner violence. Courts must strike a balance between protecting parents and children from abuse and ensuring due process and appropriate parenting time for the accused party. Some courts have considered the user experience in intimate partner violence and parenting cases, but as remote justice become the norm, it is essential for all courts to evaluate and refine the tools, policies, and procedures put in place during the emergency response to the pandemic to be more proactive in supporting court users. State courts in Kansas, North Carolina, and Arizona are cited as examples for efforts to enhance remote justice efficiency and quality in these cases involving intimate partner violence and parenting. Further research is recommended to explore the challenges and possibilities of using virtual technology in these situations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law

Reference12 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022).Preventing intimate partner violence. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ipv/IPV-factsheet_2022.pdf.

2. National Center for State Courts. (2022a).Lessons learned from the pandemic: understanding and enhancing litigants' experiences in domestic violence cases. Retrieved fromhttps://www.vawaandcourts.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/80518/Critical-Conversations-Understanding-and-Enhancing-Litigant-Experience-in-DV-Cases.pdf

3. National Center for State Courts. (2022b).E‐filing in civil protection order cases: developing guidance for safe accessible and effective systems. Retrieved fromhttps://cdm16501.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/famct/id/1805

4. National Center for State Courts. (2022c).Study of virtual child welfare hearings facilitating trauma‐responsive virtual hearings for dependency cases. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/75812/Trauma-Responsive-Virtual-Hearing.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3