The family law detection of overall risk screen (FL‐DOORS): Utility as a repeated measure for assessing change in family violence risk over time

Author:

Booth Anna T.1ORCID,Wright Bradley J.1,Pearce Heather2,Ralfs Claire2,McIntosh Jennifer E.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology & Public Health La Trobe University Bundoora Victoria Australia

2. Relationships Australia South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractConflicted parental separation is associated with risks to safety and wellbeing for all family members. The Family Law DOORS (FL‐DOORS; Detection of Overall Risk Screen) is a standardized screening framework to assist identification, evaluation, and response to family safety risks. The FL‐DOORS has previously been validated in two large Australian samples (N = 6089) and found fit‐for‐purpose as an indicator of family violence and wellbeing risks in separated families. Now, using pilot data from a community mediation context, we examine its utility as a repeated measure for detecting change in safety and wellbeing over time. A pilot cohort of 67 parents engaged in a mediation service for parenting and/or property disputes completed the FL‐DOORS at intake (T1) and approximately 8 weeks later (T2). We assessed T1‐T2 change scores and correlations in change between variables and used MANOVA to determine if clusters of related scales discriminated change across time. Findings support the psychometric capacity of the FL‐DOORS for use as a repeated measure in risk monitoring. We also note possible effects of this early screening process for reducing risk prior to engagement in mediation input. We discuss implementation utility for family law services to monitor change in risk type and magnitude over time.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law

Reference17 articles.

1. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). (2016).Guidelines for examining intimate partner violence: A supplement to the AFCC Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluation. Madison WI.https://www.afccnet.org/Portals/0/Center%20for%20Excellance/Guidelines%20for%20Examining%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence.pdf?ver=2016‐05‐16‐183725‐603

2. Detecting intimate partner violence in family and divorce mediation: A randomized trial of intimate partner violence screening.

3. Non‐normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?;Blanca M. J.;Psicothema,2017

4. Family Law Act reform: The potential for screening and risk assessment for family violence;Braaf R.;Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse,2007

5. The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment: Screening for Social-Emotional Problems and Delays in Competence

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3