Validation of a single question to measure internal health locus of control in Swedish primary care

Author:

Eriksson Maria C. M.1ORCID,Lindblad Ulf1,Daka Bledar1,Lundgren Jesper2

Affiliation:

1. Primary Health Care, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine Gothenburg University Gothenburg Sweden

2. Department of Psychology Gothenburg University Gothenburg Sweden

Abstract

BackgroundBehavioral risk factors are highlighted in the prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Screening for health locus of control could be a feasible way to better identify individuals who could benefit from preventive behavioral change interventions. The aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between a single question measuring internal health locus of control (IHLC) and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLC) and to assess how IHLC relates to the General Self‐Efficacy scale (GSE) in a primary care setting.MethodsPrimary care patients, aged 18 and older, attending three primary care centers in southwest Sweden were consecutively asked to anonymously participate in the study. The patients were given a questionnaire and instructed to return the questionnaire in a sealed box in the waiting room.ResultsIn all, 519 patients were included. The correlation between MHLC Internality and IHLC was weak (r = 0.21, p < 0.001). An increase of one point on the internality scale of the MHLC gave an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI 1.11–1.28) for reporting high IHLC, and thus a five‐point increase gave a doubled likelihood, OR = 2.40, CI 1.67–3.46. The results for the other scales of the MHLC and GSE were similar.ConclusionIn this study, we found weak but statistically significant support for the single‐question IHLC as a measure of internal health locus of control. Given that the correlation was weak, we recommend using the MHLC when possible.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3