Fourteen‐item perceived stress scale assessment using item response theory among pregnant women

Author:

Pintro Kedie1ORCID,Sanchez Sixto E.2ORCID,Rondon Marta B.3,Gelaye Bizu14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health Boston MA USA

2. Universidad de San Martin de Porres Facultad de Medicina Humana, Instituto de Investigacion Lima Peru

3. Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal Lima Peru

4. The Chester M. Pierce, M.D. Division of Global Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA USA

Abstract

The current study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish language version of the 14‐item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS‐S) in a population of pregnant women who speak Spanish in Peru using item response theory (IRT). Our study consisted of 5,435 pregnant women who participated in the Pregnancy Outcomes Maternal and Infant Study (PrOMIS) cohort in Peru. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to determine dimensionality of the scale in this population, and item response theory was conducted to determine the applicability of the PSS. The PSS consisted of a 2‐factor questionnaire measuring perceived stress and coping capacity accounting for 77% of variability. The IRT analysis showed differences in item difficulty and discrimination. Item difficulty represents the level of the latent construct where 50% of respondents endorse a particular response, and item discrimination determines the rate of change of the probability of endorsing an item for differing ability levels. For the first factor, perceived stress, item 12 was the least difficult and item 2 was the most difficult. For the second factor, coping capacity, item 9 was the least difficult and item 6 was the most difficult. The Spanish version of the 14‐item PSS can be a useful assessment tool for perceived stress, but more IRT should be done to delve further into the psychometric properties of the questionnaire to inform clinicians and policy makers more appropriately.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3