Affiliation:
1. Department of English Education Chungnam National University Yuseong‐gu Daejeon South Korea
2. Faculty of English University of Foreign Language Studies, the University of Danang Danang Vietnam
3. Department of English Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA
Abstract
AbstractThis study describes the development process and examines the construct validity of an English placement test of oral communication (EPT OC) developed at a Midwestern university in the United States. This test includes a one‐on‐one oral interview and paired discussion task, and test performance is judged on an analytic rating scale. A confirmatory factor analysis conducted on the ratings of 338 students who took the initial fully operational EPT OC revealed the test structure was represented by a correlated four‐factor model with interactional competence, fluency, pronunciation/comprehensibility, and grammar/vocabulary as sub‐constructs, in line with its targeted theoretical framework. Both tasks were effective in measuring the targeted sub‐constructs, but the sub‐constructs were not sufficiently distinct from each other to completely justify a four‐factor model. The findings provide some support for the proposed interpretations of the EPT OC test scores but indicate the need for some modifications to the assessment, such as more thorough rater training and/or revised rating scales to better distinguish the targeted sub‐constructs.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference70 articles.
1. Assessing English Language Learners’ Oral Performance: A Comparison of Monologue, Interview, and Group Oral Test
2. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (2012).ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012 ‐ Speaking.https://www.actfl.org/resources/actfl‐proficiency‐guidelines‐2012
3. Investigating the appropriateness of IELTS cut‐off scores for admissions and placement decisions at an English‐medium university in Egypt;Arrigoni E.;International English Language Testing System (IELTS) Research Reports Online Series,2015
4. THE CONSTRUCT VALIDATION OF THE FSI ORAL INTERVIEW1
5. The Construct Validation of Some Components of Communicative Proficiency