Towards Optimizing Hospitalized Older adults' MEdications (TO HOME): Multi‐centre study of medication use and outcomes in routine care

Author:

Hilmer Sarah N.1ORCID,Lo Sarita1,Kelly Patrick J.2,Viney Rosalie3,Blyth Fiona M.2,Le Couteur David G.4,McLachlan Andrew J.5,Arora Sheena3,Hossain Lutfun3,Gnjidic Danijela5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kolling Institute The University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards Australia

2. Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation University of Technology Sydney Australia

4. Centre for Education and Research on Ageing Concord Hospital and The University of Sydney Concord Australia

5. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia

Abstract

AimsComprehensively investigate prescribing in usual care of hospitalized older people with respect to polypharmacy; potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) according to Beers criteria; and cumulative anticholinergic and sedative medication exposure calculated with Drug Burden Index (DBI). Specifically, to quantify exposure to these measures on admission, changes between admission and discharge, associations with adverse outcomes and medication costs.MethodsEstablished new retrospective inpatient cohort of 2000 adults aged ≥75 years, consecutively admitted to 6 hospitals in Sydney, Australia, with detailed information on medications, clinical characteristics and outcomes. Conducted cross‐sectional analyses of index admission data from cohort.ResultsCohort had mean (standard deviation) age 86.0 (5.8) years, 59% female, 21% from residential aged care. On admission, prevalence of polypharmacy was 77%, PIMs 34% and DBI > 0 in 53%. From admission to discharge, mean difference (95% confidence interval) in total number of medications increased 1.05 (0.92, 1.18); while prevalence of exposure to PIMs (−3.8% [−5.4, −2.1]) and mean DBI score (−0.02 [−0.04, −0.01]) decreased. PIMs and DBI score were associated with increased risks (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) of falls (PIMs 1.63 [1.28, 2.08]; DBI score 1.21[1.00, 1.46]) and delirium (PIMs 1.76 [1.38, 1.46]; DBI score 1.42 [1.19, 1.71]). Each measure was associated with increased risk of adverse drug reactions (polypharmacy 1.42 [1.19, 1.71]; PIMs 1.87 [1.40, 2.49]; DBI score 1.90 [1.55, 2.15]). Cost (AU$/patient/hospital day) of medications contributing to PIMs and DBI was low ($0.29 and $0.88).ConclusionIn this large cohort of older inpatients, usual hospital care results in an increase in number of medications and small reductions in PIMs and DBI, with variable associations with adverse outcomes.

Funder

NSW Ministry of Health

Western Sydney Local Health District

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference31 articles.

1. Institute for Healthcare Improvement.Age‐friendly health systems: guide to using the 4Ms in the care of older adults.2020.https://www.ihi.org/Engage/Initiatives/Age-Friendly-Health-Systems/Documents/IHIAgeFriendlyHealthSystems_GuidetoUsing4MsCare.pdf. Accessed 20/12/2022.

2. Polypharmacy among inpatients aged 70 years or older in Australia

3. A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly in the acute care setting

4. What is known about adverse events in older medical hospital inpatients? A systematic review of the literature

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3