A comparison of end‐of‐life care quality for Veterans receiving hospice in VA nursing homes and community nursing homes

Author:

Wachterman Melissa W.123,Smith Dawn4,Carpenter Joan G.45,Griffin Hillary L.4,Thorpe Joshua67,Feder Shelli L.89ORCID,Hoelter Jillian5ORCID,Ersek Mary41011ORCID,Shreve Scott1213,Kutney‐Lee Ann41011

Affiliation:

1. Section of General Internal Medicine Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Division of General Internal Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. University of Maryland School of Nursing Baltimore Maryland USA

6. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh VA Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

7. University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

8. Yale University School of Nursing Orange Connecticut USA

9. Pain Research, Informatics, Multi‐Morbidities, and Education Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Connecticut USA

10. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

11. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

12. US Department of Veteran Affairs Hospice and Palliative Care Program Washington DC USA

13. Lebanon VA Medical Center Lebanon Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has long provided hospice care within VA community living centers (CLCs, i.e., VA nursing homes), an increasing number of Veterans are receiving hospice in VA‐contracted community nursing homes (CNHs). However, little data exist about the quality of end‐of‐life (EOL) care provided in CNHs. The aim of this study was to compare family ratings of the quality of EOL care provided to Veterans receiving hospice in VA CLCs and VA‐contracted CNHs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of national data from VA's electronic medical record and Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs or VA‐contracted CNHs between October 2021 and March 2022. The final sample included 1238 Veterans who died in either a CLC (n = 1012) or a CNH (n = 226) and whose next‐of‐kin completed the BFS. Our primary outcome was the BFS global rating of care received in the last 30 days of life. Secondary outcomes included BFS items related to symptom management, communication, emotional and spiritual support, and information about burial and survivor benefits. We compared unadjusted and adjusted proportions for all BFS outcomes between those who received hospice in CLCs and CNHs.ResultsThe adjusted proportion of family members who gave the best possible rating (a score of 9 or 10 out of a possible 10) for the overall care received near EOL was more than 13 percentage points higher for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs compared to VA‐contracted CNHs. Our findings also revealed quality gaps of even greater magnitude in specific EOL care‐focused domains.ConclusionsOur findings document inadequacies in the quality of multiple aspects of EOL care provided to Veterans in CNH‐based hospice and illuminate the urgent need for policy and practice interventions to improve this care.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Reference41 articles.

1. Hospice and palliative care 2011 annual report [Internet]. Department of Veterans Affairs.https://www.cherp.research.va.gov/PROMISE/promise_publications.asp

2. Community hospice care: referral and purchase procedures. VHA handbook 1140.5 3.5.a.2005.

3. Where Americans Die — Is There Really “No Place Like Home”?

4. Exploring the association of hospice care on patient experience and outcomes of care

5. Place of Death: Correlations With Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer and Predictors of Bereaved Caregivers' Mental Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3