Affiliation:
1. The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
Abstract
AbstractSocial movements possess transformative and progressive power. In this paper, I argue that how this is so, or even if this is so, depends on one's explanatory framework. I consider three such explanatory frameworks for social movements: methodological individualism, collectivism, and complexity theory. In evaluating the various appeals and weaknesses of these frameworks, I show that complexity theory is uniquely poised to capture the complex and dynamic reality of the social world.
Reference96 articles.
1. ACLED. (2020).Demonstrations & Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020. Retrieved from ACLED:https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations‐political‐violence‐in‐america‐new‐data‐for‐summer‐2020/
2. The Imperative of Integration
3. Anderson E.(2014).Social Movements Experiments in Living and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain's Abolition of Slavery.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献