Peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation following bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone induction for multiple myeloma: a real‐world single‐centre experience

Author:

Sim Shirlene1ORCID,Quach Hang1,Pham Tina2,Smooker Veronica3,Filshie Robin123

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Haematology St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Cellular Therapy Laboratory St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Apheresis Unit St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is now the standard‐of‐care induction therapy for newly diagnosed transplant‐eligible multiple myeloma patients, replacing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) therapy. Lenalidomide can negatively impact stem cell yield because of its myelosuppressive effects, although studies have shown that the latter can be overcome with the use of cyclophosphamide for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation.Aims and MethodsTo investigate whether lenalidomide impacts on PBSC mobilisation and to evaluate the optimal mobilisation strategy post VRd induction, we performed a retrospective review of 56 myeloma patients at a single centre who had PBSC mobilisation between January 2019 and March 2021 and compared three cohorts: (i) VCD induction; mobilisation with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) alone (n = 23); (ii) four cycles VRd induction; mobilisation with G‐CSF and cyclophosphamide (G‐CSF + Cyclo) (n = 20); and (iii) three cycles VRd induction; mobilisation with G‐CSF alone (n = 13).ResultsThere was no difference in the mean total CD34 count between VCD and VRd patients who had G‐CSF mobilisation (6.27 × 106/kg vs 5.50 × 106/kg, P > 0.99). VRd patients mobilised with G‐CSF + Cyclo achieved higher mean total CD34 counts compared with G‐CSF alone (8.89 × 106/kg vs 5.50 × 106/kg, P = 0.04). The majority of VRd patients who had G‐CSF + Cyclo (19 of 20; 95%) collected sufficient cells for two or more autologous stem cell transplants (ASCTs), regardless of whether this was required, compared with eight of 13 (62%) VRd patients who had G‐CSF alone.ConclusionWe conclude that successful PBSC mobilisation for at least one ASCT is possible after three cycles of VRd induction using G‐CSF alone. The upfront use of a cyclophosphamide‐based mobilisation strategy has a role in patients who have had VRd induction, where the aim is to collect enough stem cells for two or more ASCTs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3