Navigating ethical challenges in online wildlife trade research

Author:

Morcatty Thais Q.123ORCID,Su Shan45ORCID,Siriwat Penthai2ORCID,Andersson Astrid Alex6,Atoussi Sadek27ORCID,Feddema Kim8ORCID,Henriques Sergio91011ORCID,Janssen Jordi12ORCID,Karve Anushri13,Pytka Jennifer14ORCID,Thompson Ruth M.1516ORCID,Nijman Vincent2ORCID,Wright Joss17ORCID,Roberts David L.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geography University College London London UK

2. Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Oxford Brookes University Oxford UK

3. RedeFauna – Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna Manaus Brazil

4. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK

5. International Bird Conservation Partnership Monterey California USA

6. Division of Ecology and Biodiversity The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China

7. Laboratoire de Recherche Biologie, Eau et Environnement LBEE University 8 May 1945 Guelma Guelma Algeria

8. School of Business and Law Edith Cowan University Joondalup Western Australia Australia

9. Global Center for Species Survival Indianapolis Zoo Indianapolis Indiana USA

10. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Spider and Scorpion Specialist Group Gland Switzerland

11. Department of Biological Sciences Butler University Indianapolis Indiana USA

12. Monitor Conservation Research Society Big Lake Ranch British Columbia Canada

13. Wildlife Conservation Society Bengaluru India

14. Department of Biology University of Padova Padova Italy

15. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK

16. School of Engineering, Technology and Design Canterbury Christ Church University Canterbury UK

17. Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractThe surge in internet accessibility has transformed wildlife trade by facilitating the acquisition of wildlife through online platforms. This scenario presents unique ethical challenges for researchers, as traditional ethical frameworks for in‐person research cannot be readily applied to the online realm. Currently, there is a lack of clearly defined guidelines for appropriate ethical procedures when conducting online wildlife trade (OWT) research. In response to this, we consulted the scientific literature on ethical considerations in online research and examined existing guidelines established by professional societies and ethical boards. Based on these documents, we present a set of recommendations that can inform the development of ethically responsible OWT research. Key ethical challenges in designing and executing OWT research include the violation of privacy rights, defining subjects and illegality, and the risk of misinterpretation or posing risks to participants when sharing data. Potential solutions include considering participants’ expectations of privacy, defining when participants are authors versus subjects, understanding the legal and cultural context, minimizing data collection, ensuring anonymization, and removing metadata. Best practices also involve being culturally sensitive when analyzing and reporting findings. Adhering to these guidelines can help mitigate potential pitfalls and provides valuable insights to editors, researchers, and ethical review boards, enabling them to conduct scientifically rigorous and ethically responsible OWT research to advance this growing field.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference88 articles.

1. Local attitudes toward the cultural seasonal hunting bans in Ghana’s Bomfobiri Wildlife Sanctuary: Implications for sustainable wildlife management and tourism

2. American Anthropological Association (AAA). (2012).Ethics Statement.https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/Example_code_of_ethics‐American_Anthropological_Association‐Principles_of_Professional_Responsibility.pdf

3. American Sociological Association (ASA). (2018).ASA Code of Ethics.https://www.asanet.org/wp‐content/uploads/asa_code_of_ethics‐june2018.pdf

4. Stable isotope analysis as a tool to detect illegal trade in critically endangered cockatoos

5. CITES and beyond: Illuminating 20 years of global, legal wildlife trade

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3