Affiliation:
1. School of the Environment The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
2. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
3. WWF‐Aus Brisbane Queensland Australia
4. School of Environment and Science Griffith University Brisbane Queensland Australia
5. 2rog Consulting Brisbane Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractMany nations are struggling to reduce deforestation, despite having extensive environmental protection laws in place and commitments to international agreements that address the biodiversity and climate crises. We developed a novel framework to quantify the extent to which contemporary deforestation is being captured under national and subnational laws. We then applied this framework to northern Australia as a case study, a development and deforestation hotspot with ecosystems of global significance. First, deforestation may be compliant under all relevant legislation, either through assessment and approval or because of exemptions in the legislation. Second, deforestation may be compliant under at least one relevant law, but not all. Third, there may be no evidence of deforestation assessment or exemption from assessment, despite their apparent requirement, which could mean the deforestation is potentially noncompliant. Finally, deforestation may occur in an area or under circumstances that are beyond the intended scope of any relevant legislation. All deforestation that we analyzed was hypothetically covered by one or more laws. However, 65% of deforestation was potentially noncompliant with at least one law. Because multiple laws could be relevant to a given clearing event, the majority of clearing was still compliant with at least one law, but of these events, only a small proportion was explicitly approved (19%). The remaining were permitted under various exemptions. Of all the legislation we analyzed, most of the exempt clearing occurred under one subnational law and most potentially noncompliant clearing occurred under one national law. Our results showed that even a nation with a suite of mature environmental protection laws is falling well short of achieving international commitments regarding deforestation. Our framework can be used to pinpoint the pathways of policy change required for nations to align local laws with these international accords.
Reference96 articles.
1. Productivity improvements: Their influence on future patterns of agricultural land use in Australia;Alexander F.;Australian Commodities,2001
2. Experimental evidence that feral cats cause local extirpation of small mammals in Australia's tropical savannas
3. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil
4. Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies?
5. Australian Government Department of Climate Change Energy the Environment and Water (DCCEEW). (2020).Agricultural actions exempt from approval under national environmental law.https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/agricultural‐actions‐exempt‐approval‐under‐national‐environmental‐law‐factsheet.pdf