A meta‐analysis of mental rotation in the first years of life

Author:

Enge Alexander12ORCID,Kapoor Shreya1,Kieslinger Anne‐Sophie1,Skeide Michael A.1

Affiliation:

1. Research Group Learning in Early Childhood, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany

2. Department of Psychology Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

Abstract

AbstractMental rotation, the cognitive process of moving an object in mind to predict how it looks in a new orientation, is coupled to intelligence, learning, and educational achievement. On average, adolescent and adult males solve mental rotation tasks slightly better (i.e., faster and/or more accurate) than females. When such behavioral differences emerge during development, however, remains poorly understood. Here we analyzed effect sizes derived from 62 experiments conducted in 1705 infants aged 3–16 months. We found that male infants recognized rotated objects slightly more reliably than female infants. This difference survives correction for small degrees of publication bias. These findings indicate that gender differences in mental rotation are small and not robustly detectable in the first months of postnatal life.Research Highlights We analyzed effect sizes of 62 mental rotation experiments including 1705 infants. Looking time reveals that 3–16‐months‐old infants are able to perform mental rotation. Mental rotation is slightly more reliable in male infants compared to female infants. Gender difference in mental rotation is robust to small degrees of publication bias.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cognitive Neuroscience,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Reference86 articles.

1. Visual Cues Generated During Action Facilitate 14-Month-Old Infants’ Mental Rotation

2. Black A. &Bergmann C.(2017).Quantifying infants’ statistical word segmentation: A meta‐analysis. InG.Gunzelmann A.Howes T.Tenbrink &E.Davelaar(Eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.124–129).Cognitive Science Society.

3. Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3