A framework for understanding sources of bias in medication adherence research

Author:

Sinnappah Klarissa A.1ORCID,Hughes Dyfrig A.2ORCID,Stocker Sophie L.34ORCID,Vrijens Bernard56,Aronson Jeffrey K.7ORCID,Wright Daniel F. B.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand

2. Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation Bangor University Bangor UK

3. Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology St Vincent's Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. AARDEX Group Seraing Belgium

6. Liège University Liège Belgium

7. Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractThe sources of bias in medication adherence research have not been comprehensively explored. We aimed to identify biases expected to affect adherence research and to develop a framework for mapping these onto the phases of adherence (initiation, implementation and discontinuation). A literature search was conducted, key papers were reviewed and a Catalogue of Bias was consulted. The specific biases related to adherence measurement and metrics were mapped onto the phases of adherence using a tabular matrix. Twenty‐three biases were identified, of which 11 were specifically relevant to adherence measures and metrics. The mapping framework showed differences in the numbers and types of biases associated with each measure and metric while highlighting those common to many adherence study designs (e.g., unacceptability bias and apprehension bias). The framework will inform the design of adherence studies and the development of risk of bias tools for adherence research.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nonadherence to antiseizure medications: what have we learned and what can be done next?;Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research;2024-05-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3