Prevalence of surgical site wound infection after spine surgery in nasal colonization of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A meta‐analysis

Author:

Imam Mohamed S.12,Abdel‐Sattar Randa M.3,Alqarni Faisal4,Aljumayi Saad Yousef S.5,Altukhais Ibrahim6,Altukhays Abdullah Saad7,Abdelrahim Mohamed E. A.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacy Practice Department, College of Pharmacy Shaqra University Shaqra Saudi Arabia

2. Clinical Pharmacy Department, National Cancer Institute Cairo University Cairo Egypt

3. Biomedical Sciences Department, College of Pharmacy Shaqra University Shaqra Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Pharmacy Security Forces Hospital Riyadh Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Pharmacy Medical Center at the Facilities Security Forces Command, Medical Services Riyadh Saudi Arabia

6. Department of Pharmacy Dawadmi General Hospital Dawadmi Saudi Arabia

7. Pharmacist Al‐Dawaa Medical Services Co. Ltd Riyadh Saudi Arabia

8. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy Beni‐Suef University Beni‐Suef Egypt

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of the meta‐analysis was to evaluate and compare the prevalence of surgical site infection (SSI) after spine surgery (SS) in nasal colonization of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The results of this meta‐analysis were analysed, and the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using dichotomous or contentious random‐ or fixed‐effect models. For the current meta‐analysis, 14 examinations spanning from 2014 to 2022 were included, encompassing 18 410 people who were tested for nasal colonization after SS. MRSA‐positive had a significantly higher SSI (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.48–5.37, p < 0.001) compared with MRSA‐negative in SS subjects. However, no significant difference was found between methicillin‐susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus aureus negative (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.32–2.79, p = 0.91), and Staphylococcus aureus positive and negative (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.26–17.41, p = 0.48) in SS subjects. The examined data revealed that MRSA colonization had a significant effect on SSI; however, methicillin‐susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus aureus had no significant effect on SSI in SS subjects. However, given that some comparisons included a small number of chosen studies, attention should be given to their values.

Funder

Shaqra University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3