Nurse by numbers: The impact of early warning systems on nurses' higher‐order thinking, a quantitative study

Author:

Le Lagadec Marie Danielle1ORCID,Massey Deb2ORCID,Byrne Amy‐Louise1ORCID,Connor Justine1ORCID,Flenady Tracy1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences CQUniversity Rockhampton Queensland Australia

2. Edith Cowan University Joondalup New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate registered nurses' perceptions of whether the mandated use of the early warning system vital signs tool impacts the development of nurses' higher‐order thinking skills.DesignA concurrent mixed methods study design.MethodUsing an online survey, registered nurses' perceptions were elucidated on whether early warning system algorithmic tools affected the development of their higher‐order thinking. Likert‐type matrix questions with additional qualitative fields were used to obtain information on nurse's perceptions of the tool's usefulness, clinical confidence in using the tool, compliance with escalation protocols, work environment and perceived compliance barriers.ResultsMost of the 305 (91%) participants included in the analysis had more than 5 years of nursing experience. Most nurses supported the early warning tool and were happy to comply with escalation protocols if the early warning score concurred with their assessment of the patient (63.6%). When the score and the nurse's higher‐order thinking did not align, some had the confidence to override the escalation protocol (40.0%), while others omitted (69.4%) or inaccurately documented vital signs (63.3%) to achieve the desired score. Very few nurses (3.6%) believe using early warning tools did not impede the development of higher‐order thinking.ConclusionAlthough experienced nurses appreciate the support of early warning tools, most value patient safety above the tools and rely on their higher‐order thinking. The sustained development and use of nurses' higher‐order thinking should be encouraged, possibly by adding a critical thinking criterion to existing algorithmic tools.ImpactThe study has implications for all nurses who utilize algorithmic tools, such as early warning systems, in their practice. Relying heavily on algorithmic tools risks impeding the development of higher‐order thinking. Most experienced nurses prioritize their higher‐order thinking in decision‐making but believe early warning tools can impede higher‐order thinking.Patient or Public ContributionRegistered nurses participated as survey respondents.

Funder

Central Queensland University

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3