Improving assessment and management of suicide risk among people who inject drugs: A mixed methods study conducted at the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre, Sydney

Author:

Hocknull Kate1,Geiger Brennan2,Bartlett Mark1,Colledge‐Frisby Samantha345ORCID,Shand Fiona2,Day Carolyn A.16ORCID,Jauncey Marianne1,Roxburgh Amanda4567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre Sydney Australia

2. Black Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

3. National Drug Research Institute Curtin University Perth Australia

4. Harm and Risk Reduction, Burnet Institute Melbourne Australia

5. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia

6. Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney Australia

7. Monash Addiction Research Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPeople who inject drugs are 13 times more likely to die by suicide than the general population. Guidelines for responding to risk in this population are limited. Harm reduction services attended by people who inject drugs require targeted strategies to address the complexities of suicide risk among this population.MethodsCo‐design, engaging health professionals and people with lived experience informed the study. Mixed methods were used to understand the experience of managing suicide risk among clients attending the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre (MSIC) in Sydney. A survey was administered to assess staff confidence in managing risk. Focus groups were conducted with health professionals and MSIC clients to explore experiences of suicide management, response and opportunities for improvement.ResultsHalf (N = 17) the MSIC staff surveyed reported over 10 years' experience working with this population. Confidence in managing suicide risk was low. Three key themes emerged from focus groups (N = 17): (i) Autonomy and the need to involve clients in the assessment process; (ii) Trust between clients and health professionals, and transparency in decision‐making; and (iii) System barriers, described by health professionals as inadequate referral pathways for clients in distress, and by clients as negative experiences of care, including involuntary admission and not receiving medication (e.g. methadone).Discussion and ConclusionsRevised assessment guidelines and a tailored safety plan were developed. These resources are also suitable for other alcohol and other drug services. The challenge in managing suicide risk in harm reduction services is balancing duty of care with staff–client relationships and client engagement.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3