Affiliation:
1. School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Melbourne Carlton Victoria Australia
Abstract
AbstractMany minoritised and marginalised populations, including young people, are debating what constitutes a ‘survivable life’ and, in turn, how life can be arranged so that it is more than just survival. Notwithstanding these trends, however, there is little scholarly work on local discourses and practices of life and viability. This paper addresses this gap by examining the spatial and temporal process through which young people imagine and build viable lives in an area of the Indian Himalayas. We highlight the importance for these young people of building life as ‘jeevan’, an idea particularly associated with survival. We also highlight the significance they attach to protecting a wider, ‘puri life’ (‘whole life’), a process that affords opportunities for enjoyment and ethical fulfilment beyond survival. This account of life thought ‘on the ground’ provides a basis for reflecting on Agamben's (Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 1998) arguments about the prevalence of ‘bare life’ in the contemporary world.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference57 articles.
1. Homo Sacer
2. Bagwell S.(2018)An examination of ‘life’ in Aristotle concerning the distinction between βίος (bios) and ζωή (Zoe). Doctoral dissertation University of Saskatchewan.
3. Exorcising angry deities and spirits of the dead: Spiritual and earthly battles of married women in Uttarakhand (India)
4. Chakraborty R.(2018)The invisible (mountain) man: Migrant youth and relational vulnerability in the Indian Himalayas. The University of Wisconsin‐Madison. Unpublished PhD dissertation.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Review forum;Political Geography;2023-12