How safe is the treatment of pregnant women with fear of childbirth using eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy? Obstetric outcomes of a multi‐center randomized controlled trial

Author:

Baas Melanie A. M.12ORCID,Stramrood Claire A. I.3ORCID,Dijksman Lea M.4ORCID,Vanhommerig Joost W.5ORCID,de Jongh Ad67ORCID,van Pampus Mariëlle G.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology OLVG Amsterdam the Netherlands

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Martini Hospital Groningen the Netherlands

3. Beval Beter Amsterdam the Netherlands

4. Department of Quality and Safety St. Antoniusziekenhuis Nieuwegein the Netherlands

5. Department of Research and Epidemiology OLVG Amsterdam the Netherlands

6. Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

7. Institute of Health and Society University of Worcester Worcester UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPregnant women with fear of childbirth display an elevated risk of a negative delivery experience, birth‐related post‐traumatic stress disorder, and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birthweight, and postpartum depression. One of the therapies used to treat fear of childbirth is eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. The purpose of the present study was to determine the obstetric safety and effectiveness of EMDR therapy applied to pregnant women with fear of childbirth.Material and methodsA randomized controlled trial (the OptiMUM‐study) was conducted in two teaching hospitals and five community midwifery practices in the Netherlands (www.trialregister.nl, NTR5122). Pregnant women (n = 141) with a gestational age between 8 and 20 weeks and suffering from fear of childbirth (i.e. sum score on the Wijma Delivery Expectations Questionnaire ≥85) were randomly allocated to either EMDR therapy (n = 70) or care‐as‐usual (CAU) (n = 71). Outcomes were maternal and neonatal outcomes and patient satisfaction with pregnancy and childbirth.ResultsA high percentage of cesarean sections (37.2%) were performed, which did not differ between groups. However, women in the EMDR therapy group proved seven times less likely to request an induction of labor without medical indication than women in the CAU group. There were no other significant differences between the groups in maternal or neonatal outcomes, satisfaction, or childbirth experience.ConclusionsEMDR therapy during pregnancy does not adversely affect pregnancy or the fetus. Therefore, therapists should not be reluctant to treat pregnant women with fear of childbirth using EMDR therapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3