Irritant potential of different washing procedures used for heavy‐duty soiling: Short and intense or longer and mild?

Author:

Gina Michal1ORCID,Wichert Katharina1,Pieper Birgit2,Behrens Thomas1ORCID,Brüning Thomas1,Fartasch Manigé1

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA) Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany

2. German Social Accident Insurance – Institution for the Woodworking and Metalworking Industries (BGHM) Dortmund Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTo prevent irritant contact eczema even in occupational fields with heavy‐duty soiling, it is generally recommended to use ‘mild’ hand cleansers (mild detergent without grits, MC). On the other hand, since grit‐containing cleansers (GC) show a higher washing power that minimizes washing time, their usage is generally preferred in specific occupational fields.ObjectivesTo compare whether a shorter, intense washing period might cause less skin damage than a longer washing period with an MC.MethodsDifferences in cleaning time were first verified in a pilot study using standardized model dirt. In the main study, the forearms of 35 healthy volunteers were washed with three standardized procedures over a period of 3 days, either using 2 min of MC with/without hand brush or 1‐min GC. Clinical scoring, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, colourimetry and scaliness/roughness (Visioscan) were used to evaluate the epidermal barrier, topography and irritation.ResultsThe pre‐study showed that washing time doubled when using MC vs. GC. Using GC resulted in stronger barrier disruption, even after a shorter washing period – median ΔT4–T1 TEWL 0.96 g/m2/h vs. 4.91 g/m2/h respectively, p < 0.0001. The most harmful procedure for the skin was the additional application of a hand brush (18.86 g/m2/h).ConclusionsShort‐time washing with GC damages the skin barrier more significantly in comparison to a longer application of an MC. When washing with MC, the strongest irritant reaction occurred when accompanied with hand brushing.

Funder

Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference40 articles.

1. Development of a standardized procedure for testing the efficacy of workplace cleansers

2. TRGS 401.Technical rule for hazardous substances 401: risks resulting from skin contact – identification assessment measures. Accessed May 15 2022.https://www.baua.de/EN/Service/Legislative-texts-and-technical-rules/Rules/TRGS/TRGS-401.html.

3. S1 guideline on occupational skin products: protective creams, skin cleansers, skin care products (ICD 10: L23, L24) - short version

4. In Vivo Models of Skin Irritation

5. Impact of Water Exposure and Temperature Changes on Skin Barrier Function

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Aktualisierung der Definition der Feuchtarbeit in der neuen TRGS 401;Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt;2023-01-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3