Incisional complications after skin closure with stainless‐steel skin staples compared to nylon sutures in horses undergoing colic surgery

Author:

Haion Orr1,Tatz Amos J.1,Dahan Roee1,Harel Shiran1,Sutton Gila Abells1,Kelmer Gal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Koret School of Veterinary Medicine – Veterinary Teaching Hospital The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Rehovot Israel

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundIncisional complications following ventral midline celiotomy represent a challenge for equine surgeons. Preventative measures to minimise risks of incisional complications are continuously being investigated. This includes the search for an ideal surgical closure method.ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of incisional complications after skin closure with nylon sutures versus stainless‐steel skin staples (SSS) following ventral midline celiotomy for colic surgery in horses and to assess additional risk factors for incisional complications.Study designProspective blinded randomised study (2012–2014).MethodsOne hundred and twenty‐three horses that underwent colic surgery between May 2012 and May 2014 and survived for >2 weeks were included in the study. Horses were allocated randomly to two groups—65 horses were closed with skin staples, and 58 horses were closed with skin sutures (nylon‐0). Patient records and a follow‐up questionnaire were used to record incisional complications that occurred during hospitalisation and after discharge.ResultsFollow‐up information was available in 119 of 123 horses. Four horses without follow‐up were excluded. With strict inclusion criteria, incisional drainage was recorded in 43% (49/115) of the horses, including 40% (25/63) of the surgical staples skin closure group and 46% (24/52) of the nylon suture skin closure group. Pregnancy and large colon intestinal lesions were risk factors for incisional complications. Surgeon 3 was found to decrease the incidence of incisional infection. No association was detected between incisional complications and hernia development.Main limitationsThe non‐uniformity of the follow‐up examination; reliance on owners or caregiver of the horse for follow‐up information, horses lost to follow‐up, incomplete data. Another limitation was the single‐centre design of the study.ConclusionsAlthough not significantly superior, the use of staples may serve as a valid alternative for ventral midline abdominal incision skin closure.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Equine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3