Health‐care resource use among patients who use illicit opioids in England, 2010–20: A descriptive matched cohort study

Author:

van Hest Naomi1ORCID,Brothers Thomas D.12ORCID,Williamson Andrea3,Lewer Dan14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London London UK

2. Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Canada

3. School of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

4. Bradford Institute for Health Research Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Bradford UK

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimsPeople who use illicit opioids have higher mortality and morbidity than the general population. Limited quantitative research has investigated how this population engages with health‐care, particularly regarding planned and primary care. We aimed to measure health‐care use among patients with a history of illicit opioid use in England across five settings: general practice (GP), hospital outpatient care, emergency departments, emergency hospital admissions and elective hospital admissions.DesignThis was a matched cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics.SettingPrimary and secondary care practices in England took part in the study.ParticipantsA total of 57 421 patients with a history of illicit opioid use were identified by GPs between 2010 and 2020, and 172 263 patients with no recorded history of illicit opioid use matched by age, sex and practice.MeasurementsWe estimated the rate (events per unit of time) of attendance and used quasi‐Poisson regression (unadjusted and adjusted) to estimate rate ratios between groups. We also compared rates of planned and unplanned hospital admissions for diagnoses and calculated excess admissions and rate ratios between groups.FindingsA history of using illicit opioids was associated with higher rates of health‐care use in all settings. Rate ratios for those with a history of using illicit opioids relative to those without were 2.38 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.36–2.41] for GP; 1.99 (95% CI = 1.94–2.03) for hospital outpatient visits; 2.80 (95% CI = 2.73–2.87) for emergency department visits; 4.98 (95% CI = 4.82–5.14) for emergency hospital admissions; and 1.76 (95% CI = 1.60–1.94) for elective hospital admissions. For emergency hospital admissions, diagnoses with the most excess admissions were drug‐related and respiratory conditions, and those with the highest rate ratios were personality and behaviour (25.5, 95% CI = 23.5–27.6), drug‐related (21.2, 95% CI = 20.1–21.6) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (19.4, 95% CI = 18.7–20.2).ConclusionsPatients who use illicit opioids in England appear to access health services more often than people of the same age and sex who do not use illicit opioids among a wide range of health‐care settings. The difference is especially large for emergency care, which probably reflects both episodic illness and decompensation of long‐term conditions.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3