High diabetes‐specific distress among adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia despite widespread use of sensor technology

Abstract

AbstractAimsImpaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) has been associated with increased diabetes distress and use of sensor technology can reduce diabetes distress. The aim of this study was to examine diabetes‐specific distress (emotions, cognitions, behaviours) in relation to IAH status and use of glucose sensors in people with type 1 diabetes.MethodsIndividuals with type 1 diabetes from an academic diabetes outpatient clinic completed the Clarke questionnaire (to assess hypoglycaemic awareness), Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID‐5), Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey‐II (HFS‐II), Attitudes to Awareness of Hypoglycaemia Survey (A2A), Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument Survey (NCSI) and Hyperglycaemia Avoidance Scale (HAS).ResultsOf the 422 participants (51.9% male, diabetes duration 30 [16–40] years, HbA1c 60 ± 11 mmol/mol [7.6 ± 1.0%], 351 [88.2%] used a glucose sensor; 82 [19.4%]) had IAH. Compared to individuals with normal awareness, those with IAH more often had PAID‐5 scores ≥8 (35.4% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.008) and higher scores on all HFS‐II subscores (total [40.2 ± 21.5 vs. 27.9 ± 17.2, p < 0.001]), HFS‐II behaviour (18.5 ± 10.0 vs. 15.1 ± 8.0, p = 0.005), HFS‐II worry (21.8 ± 13.5 vs. 12.7 ± 10.9, p < 0.001), HAS worries (17.5 ± 7.3 vs. 14.3 ± 7.0, p < 0.001) and NCSI hypoglycaemia items. HAS behaviour, A2A and NCSI hyperglycaemia scores did not differ between individuals with or without IAH. Restricting the analyses to individuals using a glucose sensor did not materially change the results.ConclusionsDiabetes‐specific distress remains a major problem among individuals with type 1 diabetes, particularly those with IAH, despite the widespread use of (intermittently scanned) sensor technology. Further studies are needed to examine strategies to lower diabetes‐specific distress in individuals with IAH.