Racism underlies seemingly race‐neutral conservative criticisms of DEI statements among Black and White people in the United States

Author:

Folberg Abigail M.1ORCID,Dueland Laura Brooks1ORCID,Swanson Matthew1ORCID,Stepanek Sarah1ORCID,Hebl Mikki2ORCID,Ryan Carey S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Nebraska at Omaha Omaha Nebraska USA

2. Department of Psychological Sciences Rice University Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractWe examined how potential job candidates react to a hiring organization that requests diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements, which conservatives in the United States and elsewhere have criticized as being unrelated to job function and inappropriately political or ideological. Across three studies (two of which were pre‐registered), we compared reactions to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork or conservative values) statements as a function of race (Black vs. White), political conservatism and symbolic racism (Total N = 1108). When a DEI (vs. teamwork or politically conservative values) statement was requested, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative perceived the organization as less just, expressed less interest in the job, and expected poorer person‐organization fit, even when a job‐related rationale was provided. Further, participants who were more (vs. less) conservative evaluated a request for a statement consistent with conservative values more favourably. Thus, criticisms that DEI statements are overly political are not applied to other statements that might elicit similar concerns. Moreover, an internal meta‐analysis suggested that the relationships of conservatism to justice and interest (but not person‐organization fit) in response to requests for DEI (vs. teamwork) statements were not independent of racism. Findings were consistent with social dominance theory; racism may underlie seemingly race‐neutral backlash to DEI statements.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference64 articles.

1. Adams C. Smith A. &Tambe A.(2021).Map: See which states have passed critical race theory bills.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/map‐see‐which‐states‐have‐passed‐critical‐race‐theory‐bills‐n1271215

2. Examining the Draw of Diversity: How Diversity Climate Perceptions Affect Job-Pursuit Intentions

3. Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined

4. Canning C. M. &Reddick R. J.(2019 January 11).In defense of diversity statements.The Chronicle of Higher Education.https://www.chronicle.com/article/in‐defense‐of‐diversity‐statements/

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3