Affiliation:
1. Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Oral Sciences, Section of Orthodontics University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
2. Department of Medicine and Surgery and Dentistry University of Salerno Scuola Medica Salernitana Salerno Italy
3. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence Careggi Florence Italy
Abstract
AbstractAimThis study aimed to identify pretreatment cephalometric variables as possible predictors of the mandibular length increase in Class II patients with mandibular retrusion, treated by means of the Bite Jumping Appliance (BJA).Materials and MethodsForty‐three subjects (22 males and 21 females) with Class II malocclusion, treated with a BJA, were selected on the basis of the following inclusion criteria: full Class II molar relationship, Overjet (OVJ) ≥ 6 mm and a skeletal Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion at the start of the treatment (T0); cervical vertebral maturation stage 2 or 3 at time 0 (T0). The following mandibular structural features were measured on lateral cephalograms at time 0 and time 1 (15 months of treatment): the width and height of the mandibular symphysis and its width/height ratio, the width and height of the mandibular ramus and its width/height ratio, the antegonial notch depth and the Condilion–Gonion–Menton (Co–Go–Me) angle. Post‐treatment changes were assessed by Pancherz's cephalometric analysis, evaluating the increases in mandibular length. A regression statistical model was used to test the association between morphologic variables and mandibular length changes.ResultsAt T1, a significant increase in mandibular length (7.1 + 3.4 mm, p < .001) was measured. A significant negative association between the pretreatment Co–Go–Me angle and mandibular length change was found (p < .05). IMPA angle was negatively associated with mandibular length change. All the others morphological feature were not statistically related to mandibular length change.ConclusionCo–Go–Me angle and IMPA angle at T0 can be used as predictors for mandibular response to the treatment with BJA.