Affiliation:
1. New York State Department of Health Birth Defects Registry Albany New York USA
2. Department of Epidemiology Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health University at Albany Rensselaer New York USA
4. CDT Analytics Adelaide South Australia Australia
5. The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
6. Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA
7. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Abstract
SummaryZolpidem is a non‐benzodiazepine agent indicated for treatment of insomnia. While zolpidem crosses the placenta, little is known about its safety in pregnancy. We assessed associations between self‐reported zolpidem use 1 month before pregnancy through to the end of the third month (“early pregnancy”) and specific birth defects using data from two multi‐site case–control studies: National Birth Defects Prevention Study and Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study. Analysis included 39,711 birth defect cases and 23,035 controls without a birth defect. For defects with ≥ 5 exposed cases, we used logistic regression with Firth's penalised likelihood to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, considering age at delivery, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, parity, early‐pregnancy antipsychotic, anxiolytic, antidepressant use, early‐pregnancy opioid use, early‐pregnancy smoking, and study as potential covariates. For defects with three–four exposed cases, we estimated crude odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, we explored differences in odds ratios using propensity score‐adjustment and conducted a probabilistic bias analysis of exposure misclassification. Overall, 84 (0.2%) cases and 46 (0.2%) controls reported early‐pregnancy zolpidem use. Seven defects had sufficient sample size to calculate adjusted odds ratios, which ranged from 0.76 for cleft lip to 2.18 for gastroschisis. Four defects had odds ratios > 1.8. All confidence intervals included the null. Zolpidem use was rare. We could not calculate adjusted odds ratios for most defects and estimates are imprecise. Results do not support a large increase in risk, but smaller increases in risk for certain defects cannot be ruled out.
Funder
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献