Adherence to antihypertensives in the United States: A comparative meta‐analysis of 23 million patients

Author:

Dean Yomna E.1ORCID,Motawea Karam R.1,Shebl Mohamed A.2ORCID,Elawady Sameh Samir3,Nuhu Kaamel4,Abuzuaiter Basel4,Awayda Karen4,Fouad Ahmed Mahmoud5,Tanas Yousef1,Batista Raquel4,Elsayed Ahmed5,Hassan Noheir A. I. F6,El‐Sakka Amro A.5,Hasan Walaa5,Husain Raabia7,Lois Amanda3,Arora Aryan8,Arora Abhinav8,Ayad Elyas9,Elbahaie Mohamed A.10,Shah Jaffer11ORCID,Shady Amr4,Chaudhuri Debanik4,Aiash Hani4

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt

2. Faculty of Medicine Cairo University Kasr Al‐Ainy Cairo Egypt

3. Medical University of South Carolina Charleston USA

4. SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse USA

5. Faculty of Medicine Suez Canal University Ismailia Egypt

6. Faculty of Medicine Aswan University Aswan Egypt

7. SUNY Buffalo Buffalo USA

8. Syracuse University Syracuse USA

9. SUNY Oswego Oswego USA

10. Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies Jeddah Saudi Arabia

11. Weill Cornell Medicine New York USA

Abstract

AbstractAdherence to antihypertensives is crucial for control of blood pressure. This study analyzed factors and interventions that could affect adherence to antihypertensives in the US. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched on January 21, 2022 and December 25, 2023 for studies on the adherence to antihypertensives in the US. Nineteen studies and 23 545 747 patients were included in the analysis, which showed that adherence to antihypertensives was the highest among Whites (OR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.34–1.61 compared to African Americans). Employment status and sex were associated with insignificant differences in adherence rates. In contrast, marital status yielded a significant difference where unmarried patients demonstrated low adherence rates compared to married ones (OR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.67–0.95). On analysis of comorbidities, diabetic patients reported lower adherence to antihypertensives (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.97); furthermore, patients who did not have Alzheimer showed higher adherence rates. Different BMIs did not significantly affect the adherence rates. Patients without insurance reported significantly lower adherence rates than insured patients (OR: 3.93, 95% CI 3.43–4.51). Polypill users had higher adherence rates compared with the free‐dose combination (OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.2–1.21), while telepharmacy did not prove to be as effective. Lower adherence rates were seen among African Americans, uninsured, or younger patients. Accordingly, interventions such as fixed‐dose combinations should be targeted at susceptible groups. Obesity and overweight did not affect the adherence to antihypertensives.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3