The color‐matching ability of single‐shade universal composites in extracted human teeth

Author:

Koi Kiyono1ORCID,Amaya‐Pajares Silvia P.1ORCID,Kawashima Satoki12,Arora Garima1,Ferracane Jack1ORCID,Watanabe Hidehiko1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Biosciences—Division of Restorative Dentistry Oregon Health & Science University—School of Dentistry Oregon USA

2. Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry The University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the color‐match with extracted natural teeth of three single‐shade universal composites, a group‐shade universal composite, and a highly translucent‐shade conventional composite.MethodsTwenty extracted human teeth were divided into light‐ and dark‐shade groups (n = 10, LSG and DSG). A preparation was restored with the 3 single‐shade universal composites, OMNICHROMA (OMC), Admira Fusion x‐tra U (AFU), and Essentia U (ESU); a highly translucent‐shade conventional composite, Tetric EvoCeram T (TEC‐T); and two shades of a group‐shade universal composite—Filtek Universal Restorative (FUR A1 and A4). Composites were photopolymerized, polished, and stored in water for 24 h. The ΔE00 value between the unprepared and restored surfaces was obtained using a spectrophotometer. Composite placement and measurements were repeated three times per tooth. Color differences were statistically analyzed with the within‐between‐subjects t‐test and repeated‐measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni adjustment (α = 0.05).ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between OMC and FUR (A1 and A4). AFU and ESU showed significantly higher ΔE00 values than OMC and TEC‐T (p < 0.05). Single‐shade composites exhibited significantly higher ΔE00 values in the DSG than in the LSG except ESU (p < 0.05). None of the composites satisfied the criteria for an acceptable match (ΔE00 >1.8).ConclusionOMC showed the same color matching ability as a group‐shade universal composite. A highly translucent‐shade conventional composite and OMC exhibited better color matching ability than other single‐shade composites. Overall, single‐shade universal composites performed better in lighter‐shaded teeth.Clinical SignificanceSingle‐shade universal composites have the potential to reduce chair time by eliminating shade selection in cavities with lighter‐shade teeth. Highly translucent incisal conventional composites also may be used if the appropriate shade of composite is not available.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Anatomical form defines color: function, form, and aesthetics;Terry DA;Pract Proced Aesthet Dent,2002

2. Color and Appearance in Dentistry

3. Aesthetic anterior composite restorations: a guide to direct placement;LeSage BP;Dent Clin N Am,2007

4. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations;Dietschi D;J Adhes Dent,2001

5. Layering composites for ultimate aesthetics in direct restorations;Beddis HP;Dent Update,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3