Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Alqutaibi Ahmed Yaseen12ORCID,Alghauli Mohammed Ahmed3ORCID,Almuzaini Sarah A.4,Alharbi Abdullah F.4,Alsani Abdulrahman A.4,Mubarak Arwa M.4,Alhajj Mohammed Nasser5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Substitutive Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry Taibah University Al‐Madinah Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Ibb University Ibb Yemen

3. Prosthodontics Department, College of Dentistry Ibb University Ibb Yemen

4. College of Dentistry Taibah University Al‐Madinah Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Thamar University Dhamar Yemen

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this review was to assess clinical trials that have examined the materials, design, and bonding of ceramic cantilevered resin‐bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) as a potential option for replacing missing anterior teeth. The evaluation primarily focuses on the rate of restoration failure and clinical complications.Materials and MethodsA thorough search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted. The most recent search was performed in October 2023. Clinical studies that compared ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs with double retainers or cantilevered RBFDPs using different ceramic materials or bonding systems were included. The outcome measures considered were restoration failure and complication rates.ResultsTwelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data showed a statistically significant decrease in complication events when using cantilever designs compared with double retainer designs (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences found between the two designs in terms of restoration failure. The complication and failure rate of cantilever RBFDPs did not show a statistically significant difference with or without ceramic primer application before luting with phosphate monomer‐containing luting resin (p > 0.05).ConclusionsCeramic cantilevered RBFDPs have lower complication rates compared with those with double retainers. The use of a ceramic primer prior to luting composite resin for ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs decreases the occurrence of complications and failures, although this effect was not statistically significant. Additional research is required to confirm these findings. Glass ceramic cantilever RBFDPs showed a decrease in success after 6 years, requiring ongoing monitoring, but both zirconia and glass‐infiltrated alumina cantilever RBFDPs have demonstrated durability with excellent long‐term success and survival rates for up to 10 and 15 years.Clinical SignificanceCantilever ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region are a less invasive and valuable treatment option, providing good esthetic results.

Funder

Taibah University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3