Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of veneers generated by the guided prosthetic tooth preparation system

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis in vitro study aimed to assess and contrast the marginal and internal adaptation of all‐ceramic prefabricated veneers manufactured via the FirstFit guided tooth preparation system against all‐ceramic veneers produced using the chairside Computer‐Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacture (CAD/CAM) system following identical guided preparation protocols.Materials and MethodsTwo main groups were included, with 16 lithium disilicate veneers per group. Four typodonts were used for the test (FirstFit) and control CAD/CAM groups. Intraoral scans created master casts and preparation guides. Guides performed preparations on typodont teeth (two central incisors and two lateral incisors). Prepared teeth were scanned (CEREC Omnicam) to design and mill CAD/CAM veneers. Marginal gap thickness and cement space thickness were measured using light microscopy at four locations: marginal, cervical internal, middle internal, and incisal internal.ResultsNo significant difference existed between groups for marginal adaptation (p = 0.058) or incisal internal adaptation (p = 0.076). The control group had significantly lower values for middle internal adaptation (p = 0.023) and cervical internal adaptation (p = 0.019).ConclusionsGuided preparation evaluation showed no significant differences in marginal or incisal internal adaptation. The CAD/CAM group had significantly lower middle and cervical internal adaptation values.