Affiliation:
1. School of Mathematics University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
2. Harvard Business School Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
3. Harvard Business School, Digital Reskilling Lab Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
Abstract
AbstractThis paper analyzes a two‐period membership market with two symmetric firms charging a membership fee, allowing consumers to buy products or services at a given price. Firms can offer short‐term (ST) or long‐term (LT) memberships. When firms employ LT memberships, they have incentives to prevent their old customers from being poached by competitors and price‐discriminate them based on purchase behavior. Conversely, ST memberships lead to no unit price discrimination for old customers, but instead, they lead to membership fee discrimination, increasing the share of switchers. We find that, under general assumptions, ST memberships are offered in equilibrium. This result is robust to various extensions, including switching coupons or discounts, naive consumers, sunk costs, and asymmetric differentiation parameters. We find that firms are indifferent between ST and LT memberships only when the customer's switching coupon or discount is high relative to the transportation cost.
Reference36 articles.
1. Nonlinear pricing;Armstrong M.;Annual Review of Economics,2016
2. Competitive price discrimination;Armstrong M.;The RAND Journal of Economics,2001
3. Competitive nonlinear pricing and bundling;Armstrong M.;Review of Economic Studies,2010
4. Strategic Loyalty Reward in Dynamic Price Discrimination
5. Endogenous switching costs in a duopoly model;Caminal R.;International Journal of Industrial Organization,1990