Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo investigate the long‐term implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants with different variables associated over an observational period of at least 20 years.Materials and MethodsPatients with at least one implant placed prior to 2001 were recalled and visited. Data on implant macro‐design, prosthetic aspects, site distribution, and patient‐related factors were collected. MBL was evaluated on intraoral X‐rays and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters were recorded. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the treatment received. Descriptive statistics indicators were estimated. Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance models were used to investigate any differences in the MBL and peri‐implant probing depth (PPD) among the variables. A chi‐square analysis was performed to investigate any association between different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and survival/success outcomes.ResultsForty‐one (41) patients and 174 implants were included with a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. The implant survival and success rates were 96.5% and 83.3% respectively, while 3.5% of early failures were detected. The lowest success rates were observed for implants supporting fixed full‐arch rehabilitations (71.05%) and overdenture rehabilitations (86.11%). A mean MBL of 1.81 ± 0.71 mm and a mean PPD of 3.38 ± 1.62 mm were recorded. The interaction between the collected data with MBL and PPD did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the variables (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was recorded when analyzing the association between the different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and success rates (p = 0.014), with fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations presenting with lower success rates. Answers to the questionnaire showed a generally high level of satisfaction.ConclusionsWithin the limits of this retrospective study and based on the results, an implant survival rate higher than 96% was observed after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Both the implant survival rate and MBL seemed stable after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Implants supporting fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations seemed to present lower success rates over time. Implant rehabilitation seemed to provide patients with optimal long‐term outcomes in terms of functional and psychological aspects.